Every patient brings more than a complaint—they bring a story waiting to be heard.
This Explanation shows you how to quickly surface the real reasons for encounter and turn minutes of listening into therapeutic trust and diagnostic clarity.
Learn the exact questions that change trajectories and make your consultation count.
Cite as: Crijnen, AAM & Kraan, HF (2026, January 1). Exploring Reasons for Encounter. Retrieved from https://www.maas-mi.eu/explanation/1-reasons-for-encounter
The opening minutes of a consultation shape diagnostic accuracy, adherence, and satisfaction. This Explanation offers a concise, evidence-based approach for medical students and residents to elicit the patient’s agenda and explore their beliefs, emotions, and functional impact.
Make exploration your default lens
A practical eight-element framework and simple habits reduce late-arising concerns, improve data quality, and support efficient, patient-centered encounters.
Picture your next consultation. A patient leads with worry—Doctor, I’m so worried; I have so much pain here—and you feel the pull to narrow and redirect. Your first words determine whether you’ll understand their concerns, align on goals, and create a plan they can follow. This guide shows how to use the opening minutes to get the right story, reduce diagnostic error, and build adherence (Robinson & Heritage, 2006; Singh et al., 2013; Schiff et al., 2008).
• Helps you find practical answers to these interviewing challenges
• Supports deliberate practice to hone communication skills.
Most physicians interrupt after about 23 seconds; only 28% of patients finish their opening statement (Marvel et al., 1999). Early interruption short-circuits rapport and data gathering.
Rushed openings lower satisfaction and adherence and increase follow-up contacts (Bell et al., 2002). Late-arising “doorknob” concerns occur about 2.5 times more often when the full agenda isn’t explored early (Marvel et al., 1999; Ospina et al., 2018).
Uninterrupted, open-ended openings improve information quality and reduce diagnostic error by preventing premature closure (Robinson & Heritage, 2006; Schiff et al., 2008; Singh et al., 2013; Walker et al., 1990).
Compare: So, you’re here about your headaches? versus What would you like to talk about today? The first narrows; the second invites a story. Open-ended questions improve perceived listening and communication quality (Cox & Fritz, 2022; Robinson & Heritage, 2006).
What would you like to talk about today? Tell me
Ask: Is there something else you’d like to talk about? “Something” invites; “anything” discourages (Heritage et al., 2007). Physicians elicit full agendas in only about 36% of encounters, yet uninterrupted patients speak only about six seconds longer on average (Ospina et al., 2019). The skill is learnable; training roughly doubles the rate at which openings are allowed to finish (Marvel et al., 1999).
Is there something else…?
When patients arrive, they bring symptoms and stories—worries, theories, attempts, and disruptions in life. Use these eight elements to understand the real problem you’re solving.
As pattern recognition sharpens, the risk of “expertise drift” grows—shifting from exploration to hypothesis confirmation, from patient- to physician-centered interviewing.
Guard against this with deliberate practice (Mamede & Schmidt, 2023):
Remember the payoff: Thorough openings add about six seconds on average, but reduce surprises and rework (Ospina et al., 2019; Coyle et al., 2022).
Patients bring symptoms and stories. Exploring their agenda, beliefs, emotions, and function is core clinical work that improves accuracy, adherence, and outcomes. The minutes you invest up front prevent rework later.
Make exploration your default lens—applied efficiently when it matters most—and your consultations will become more accurate, collaborative, and effective.
Coyle, A. C., Yen, R. W., & Elwyn, G. (2022). Interrupted opening statements in clinical encounters: A scoping review. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(8)
Cox, C., & Fritz, Z. (2022). Presenting complaint: Use of language that disempowers patients. BMJ.
Mamede, S., & Schmidt, H. G. (2023). Deliberate reflection and clinical reasoning: Founding ideas and empirical findings. Medical Education, 57(1), 76–85.
Bell, R. A., Kravitz, R. L., Thom, D., Krupat, E., & Azari, R. (2002). Unmet expectations for care and the patient-physician relationship. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(11), 817–824.
Brancazio, S., Eskildsen, S. M., Abimbola, F., Olcott, C. W., Kamath, G. V., & Del Gaizo, D. J. (2020). Unmet patient expectations for interventions decrease provider satisfaction scores. Orthopedics, 43(5), E378–E382.
Cella, D., Nolla, K., & Peipert, J. D. (2024). The challenge of using patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice: how do we get there? Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 8(1).
Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D., Elliott, M. N., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(10), 1429–1433.
Hood-Medland, E. A., White, A. E. C., Kravitz, R. L., & Henry, S. G. (2021). Agenda setting and visit openings in primary care visits involving patients taking opioids for chronic pain. BMC Family Practice, 22(1).
Jelin, E., Bjertnaes, O., & Norman, R. M. (2024). Factors associated with patients’ experience of accessibility to general practice: results from a national survey in Norway. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1008.
Lowry, V., Desmeules, F., Lavigne, P., Roy, J.-S., Cormier, A.-A., Lefebvre, M.-C., Hudon, A., Perreault, K., & Tousignant-laflamme, Y. (2023). Patients’ expectations and experiences with primary care management: A qualitative study. The Annals of Family Medicine, 21(Supplement 3), 5333.
Marvel, M. K., Epstein, R. M., Flowers, K., & Beckman, H. B. (1999). Soliciting the Patient’s Agenda: Have We Improved? JAMA, 281(3), 283–287.
Mulder-Vos, I., Driever, E., open, P. B.-B., & 2023, undefined. (2023). Observational study on the timing and method of interruption by hospital consultants during the opening statement in outpatient consultations. BMJ Open, 13(9).
Ospina, N. S., Phillips, K. A., Rodriguez-Gutierrez, R., Castaneda-Guarderas, A., Gionfriddo, M. R., Branda, M. E., & Montori, V. M. (2019). Eliciting the patient’s agenda-secondary analysis of recorded clinical encounters. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(1), 36–40.
Oster, A., Wiking, E., Nilsson, G. H., & Olsson, C. B. (2024). Patients’ expectations of primary health care from both patients’ and physicians’ perspectives: a questionnaire study with a qualitative approach. Springer, 25(1).
Robinson, J. D., & Heritage, J. (2006). Physicians’ opening questions and patients’ satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 60(3), 279–285.
Schiff, G. , D., Hasan, O., & Kim, S. (2009). Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Archives Internal Medicine, 169(20), 1881–1887.
Singh, H., Giardina, T. D., Meyer, A. N. D., Forjuoh, S. N., Reis, M. D., & Thomas, E. J. (2013). Types and Origins of Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Settings. JAMA Internal Medicine, 173(6), 418–425.
Sirera, B., Naanyu, V., Kussin, P., & Lagat, D. (2024). Impact of patient-centered communication on patient satisfaction scores in patients with chronic life-limiting illnesses: an experience from Kenya. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1290907.
Walker, H.,K. (1990). The origins of the history and physical examination. In H., K. Walker, W. , D. Hall, & J. , W. Hurst (Eds.), Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations (pp. 1–24). NCBI.
